Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y?
От | t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199808040231.LAA25087@srapc451.sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in gram.y? ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> > it seems that it doesn't accept a createdb with the >> > option location = ... but without the option encoding = ... > >I think the code is sub-optimal for a couple of reasons: > >1) LOCATION must be the first argument, ENCODING must be the second. The >number and order of any options should be flexible. > >2) the options should have a comma delimiter between them. Currently >they do not. To introduce the comma delimiter will require restructuring >that part of the parsing, but isn't a big deal. > >I'm pretty sure that the options can be specified individually, but it >does not generalize well. The two specific problems above should be >considered fatal for a final version :/ > >I've worked through problems like this for other SQL92 syntax, and can >probably fix up this one too. Will put it on my list unless someone else >wants it... I'm responsible for that problem. But seems you have a better solution. Please take it. -- Tatsuo Ishii t-ishii@sra.co.jp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: