Re: [HACKERS] cidr
От | Hal Snyder |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] cidr |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19980721233540.23617@roxor.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] cidr (Paul A Vixie <vixie@vix.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Just voicing enthusiasm for the "cidr" thread: Bruce is right on when he refers to this as "KILLER APP" - PostgreSQL is a great tool for running administering a network. (I contributed a couple smallish functions about a year ago to do simple address formatting and in-subnet testing.) Especially when you mix in CVS for version controlling config files and rsync+ssh for pushing them. My preference is CIDR over INET or anything else for the type name. Let's get IPv6 in while Paul is focused on us. Vixie's input is essential for keeping us On The Right Track with this thing - I'd give him 100 votes and the rest of us 1 each in all the debates. :-) A data type is much more useful if it has enough supporting functions - I too like the idea of a built-in (quasi-standard) way of extracting host and class. The easier we make the type to use, the more people will use it. I think this is just the tip of the iceberg (others have hinted at this too). PostgreSQL + CVS + rsync/ssh + apache makes one powerful net admin system, but it's a tool chest with just the nuts and bolts. As we use the new CIDR datatype, I hope we'll evolve a good, general set of tools around the network database.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: