Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199807131854.OAA21346@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names. (Stuart Rison <stuart@NOJUNK_ludwig.ucl.ac.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Yeah I guess I didn't explain that very well. Suppose you did > > \d test > > you'd get > > Field | Type | Length > ------------------------------ > blah | text | var > number | int2 | 2 > code | char() | 15 > > [hand-made table :)] > > now what is was -badly- trying to say was that is you did a \d of that > table you'd get: > > > Field | Type | Length > ----------------------------------- > Field | varchar() | 31 > Type | varchar() | 10 > Length | int2 | 2 > > [or something like that, I'm guessing the numbers/types] > > so a sort of \d on a \d which would have given me the max length of field. > If I understood Herouth's mail properly, all this information (i.e. catalog > table) are store as 'hidden' tables in the DBMS. In Oracle it appears > these are actually 'usable' in SQL statements -if you know their names and > he was suggesting that the same could be of postgreSQL (I'm sorry if I got > that all wrong Herouth). That is \dT, no? -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: