Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199807131745.NAA19947@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GENERAL] Length of field names. (Stuart Rison <stuart@NOJUNK_ludwig.ucl.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Length of field names.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> So my guess is that with the original name, malignant_pathologies_invasive > and the primary key created by it (normally > malignant_pathologies_invasive_pkey) end up having the same name because of > the cut-off? > > Does this seem right? If so, what is the max length of field names and can > anyone suggest a way around this problem (obviously I could just give the > tables shorter names but they are computer generated by a Perl script and > if at all possible, I'd like to keep the filed and table names in this long > format). max length is 31. > PS. For those that have been following the \dt <regex> discussion, in this > case I would have like a '\d \dt' kind of query to get PG to give me the > type and length of the Field field (which is more of an SQL query type of > question so probably would have required SQL access to catalog tables as > Herouth suggested). Huh? Doesn't \d \dt do that if you supply the table name? -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: