Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199806081529.LAA09224@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? (Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Well, my plans for 6.4: > > 1. Btree: use TID as (last) part of index key; prepare btree > for low-level locking (it's now possible to lose root page). > 2. Vacuum: speed up index cleaning; release pg_class lock after > updation statistic for a table. > 3. Buffer manager: error handling broken; should flush only > buffers changed by backend itself. > 4. Implement shared catalog cache; get rid of invalidation code. > 5. Subselects: in target list; in FROM. > 6. Transaction manager: get rid of pg_variable; do not prefetch > XIDs; nested transactions; savepoints. That's quite a list. Vadim, I hate to ask, but how about the buffering of pg_log writes and the ability to do sync() every 30 seconds then flush pg_log, so we can have crash reliability without doing fsync() on every transaction. We discussed this months ago, and I am not sure if you were thinking of doing this for 6.4. I can send the old posts if that would help. It would certainly increase our speed vs. fsync(). -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: