Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

> The second option (your earlier suggestion) seems to be necessary and sufficient.   The junk filter (and
> jf_cleanTupType) will always exist, for SELECT statements, as long as the following is not a legal statement:
>
>         SELECT   FROM foo GROUP BY bar;
>
> Currently the parser will not accept it.  Sufficient.
>
> The first option will set tupType, for non-SELECT statements, to something it otherwise may not have been.
> I would rather not risk effecting those calling routines which are not executing a SELECT command.  At this
> time, I do not understand them enough, and I see no benefit.   Necessary?

OK, I will leave it alone.  Is there a way to use junk filters only in
cases where we need them?

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)