Re: [HACKERS] An item for the TODO list: pg_dump and multiple table owners
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] An item for the TODO list: pg_dump and multiple table owners |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199805062145.RAA01516@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | An item for the TODO list: pg_dump and multiple table owners (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > pg_dump doesn't cope very gracefully at all with databases containing > multiple tables not all owned by the same person. It knows enough > to issue \connect commands in the reload script that cause the > new tables to be owned by the same people as before. But the reload > script fails with permission errors later on during the data copying > phase, if the tables are not made world-writable. > > This is certain to happen if the -z switch is not used to dump the > tables' grant/revoke status. I suspect that pg_dump ought not try > to save/restore table ownership unless it is also saving/restoring > access rights; that is, if -z is not given the \connect commands > shouldn't appear either. Then, without -z the reload script will > generate a new database wholly owned by the script invoker. > > When using -z, the failure of the copy-in command could be fixed by > issuing more \connect commands so that the data transfer is done while > logged in as the table owner. > > This is particularly nasty because the reload script fails even if > run as the Postgres superuser. I think this is because the script > reconnects as the various table owners and thereby loses superuser > access rights. This is a very good point. I will look into it. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: