Re: [INTERFACES] VB and ODBC: found
От | Stephen Davies |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] VB and ODBC: found |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199804271211.VAA24591@mustang.sdc.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | VB and ODBC: found (Sbragion Denis <infotecn@tin.it>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
> Hello, > > after a fast look I found a reference in the MS knowledge base: > > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q109/8/00.asp > > little excerpt: > > Before you can edit an external ODBC table, the table must contain a unique > index. If you get the following error message, you might not have a unique > index on the table: > > Can't perform operation; it is illegal. > > You could also receive this error if the Data1.Recordset.Updatable flag is > not set to True. Also, if you set the Data1.Options property to 64 > (SQL_PASSTHROUGH), the data control will not be updatable. > OK. Maybe that is the difference. I never use data controls to access ODBC databases: the performance is awful. There also seem to be strange constraints placed by MS on some types of recordsets: the "safest" seem to be tables rather than dynasets etc. I always use direct calls to the ODBC DLL. This is quite easy and, in general, gives performance comparable with native SQL commands - and does not require unique indexes or other strange MS policies.. Having said that, my personal preference is to have a unique key in every table and if there is no obvious candidate, to make that key a system-generated sequence number. Cheers, Stephen. ======================================================================== Stephen Davies Consulting scldad@sdc.com.au Adelaide, South Australia. Voice: 61-8-82728863 Computing & Network solutions. Fax: 61-8-82741015
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: