Re: AW: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199803191950.OAA14676@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: [HACKERS] varchar() vs char16 performance ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't really see this as a big deal since, for example, only 16 bytes > are allocated for a char16, so it is not guaranteed to be zero delimited > and you have to make a working copy to use libc functions anyway. Also, > that is really an implementation detail or annoyance rather than a > user-visible feature. Agreed. > With the macros that are provided for the varlena structure > manipulations, things are pretty convenient. Are there more macros which > could be helpful here?? From postgres.h: #define VARSIZE(PTR) (((struct varlena *)(PTR))->vl_len) #define VARDATA(PTR) (((struct varlena *)(PTR))->vl_dat) #define VARHDRSZ sizeof(int32) I have gone throught the code before 6.3, and changed many hard-coded 4's to use these macros. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: