Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unique index using hash? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199803170302.WAA01018@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Unique index using hash? (ocie@paracel.com) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I was playing around with my latest compile and tried to make a unique > index on two columns, using a hash method. Both of these (more than > one column and unique) are currently not allowed for hash indexes. > > I thought about this for a bit and realized that making a NESTED hash > index (index on a and b also serves as an index on a) would be a > trick, but allowing the unique clause should not be a problem. > > Therefore, I would like to try implementing unique constraints on hash > indexes. Has this come up before? Are there any reasons not to > support this? As far as I understand, specifying an index method is > non standard (above and beyond standard) to begin with. > It is on the TODO list: * add UNIQUE capability to non-btree indexes -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: