Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199803141715.MAA14997@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I have not had a chance yet to browse the postgres code, some silliness about > my day job keeps interfering, so it may be a few weeks before I get to this. > > My thought is that comitting transactions can't release locks until the log > is written. So, if the log is not flushed except every so often, locks are > held longer harming concurrancy. > > Of course, I am probably thinking about "normal" WAL type transactions not > the "unique" postgres log thing which truth to tell I may never have > really understood. You have good point here. We are telling an application that the transaction is committed, even though if there is a crash in the next 10 seconds, on reboot, it will show it as not committed. It is my understanding that all buffered logging database systems have this problem, so I think we will just have to live with it. I believe we will still continue to offer the original fsync() after commit behavior. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: