Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Snapshot has not compiled in a couple of days
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Snapshot has not compiled in a couple of days |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199802250450.XAA01872@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Snapshot has not compiled in a couple of days (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Snapshot has not compiled in a couple of days
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > remaining messages. Can we get rid of the shift/reduce conflicts? I > > haven't looked at the code, but there is a debugging flag on yacc/bison > > ("-v") which will write a log file identifying the conflicting > > statements. I have some experience debugging this on the main parser, > > but need to work on docs so shouldn't do this at the moment :( > > If I can figure out bison, I'll try and work these out...one way > to learn, I guess :) This ecps is hot, but it seems it is still 'in process' as we approach release date. Can we do what we did with pgaccess, and get a web site that has the most recent version, and just ship a current version with 6.3, and people can go to the web site to get the newest copy? We put a nice README in the pgaccess directory pointing people to a web site having the most recent version. Seemed to work well. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: