Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on copy
| От | Brett McCormick |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on copy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199802202211.OAA15363@abraxas.scene.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on copy (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Permissions on copy
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
either-or or just a select, so it is forced to go through the executor? If we do that, what about reload the database.. it seems like copy should just dump the table as-is and not do funny tricks that make it impossible to COPY FROM... On Fri, 20 February 1998, at 12:10:29, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Second, there was the idea of making copy allow a real select statement > > and not just a table name. If we do that, all goes through the > > executor, and you get view and rules working properly. May have some > > performance penalty, though it probabably will be minor. > > This sounds reasonable... > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: