Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199802181508.KAA15640@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] ecpg stuff ("Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Meskes, Michael wrote: > > > > Or we should change the declare/open behaviour in that it ignores the > > embedded SQL declare command and just sends the declare command when it > > finds an open. But then standard may say that the actual way is correct. > > It seems that OPEN is in standard and this is really bad that we havn't > OPEN statement: using DECLARE we could plan query once and then > re-use this plan many times - OPEN, FETCH-es, CLOSE; OPEN, ... > Also, we could use queries with parameters (like in SQL-funcs: $1, ...) > in DECLARE and then assign parameter' values in OPEN and execute > cursor for different values. > Isn't this what Oracle allow ? Yes, I agree we should have it, and allow cursors outside transactions with OPEN/CLOSE behavior. Added to TODO. -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: