Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199802061800.NAA15035@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Bug? (Tom I Helbekkmo <tih@Hamartun.Priv.NO>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Bruce Momjian said: > > > The only fix for this would be to read all integers in as 64-bit > > integers, then do the conversion, but that could be a performance > > problem. > > Michael Meskes answered: > > > I agree. And performance is important. I think explicit type > > conversion is what we should do. Or is it asked for too much if the > > user has to add a ::float8 to the number? > > Am I being dense here? Can there really be a significant performance > hit in the parsing of a query? Let's say that it takes a millisecond > extra to do the right thing with a number. Does it matter? How many > queries per second can we expect to process anyway? I don't know of standard ways to read in 64-bit integers. -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: