Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19949.1292363705@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Hmm, the first idea that comes to mind is to use a counter like the >> GetXLogRecPtrForTemp() counter I used for temp tables, but global, in shared >> memory. However, that's a bit problematic because if we store a value from >> that counter to LSN, it's possible that the counter overtakes the XLOG >> insert location, and you start to get xlog flush errors. We could avoid that >> if we added a new field to the GiST page header, and used that to store the >> value in the parent page instead of the LSN. > That doesn't seem ideal, either, because now you're eating up some > number of bytes per page in every GIST index just on the off chance > that one of them is unlogged. On-disk compatibility seems problematic here as well. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: