Re: BUG #5732: parsing of: "WHERE mycol=123AND ..."
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5732: parsing of: "WHERE mycol=123AND ..." |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19944.1288463031@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5732: parsing of: "WHERE mycol=123AND ..." (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5732: parsing of: "WHERE mycol=123AND ..."
Re: BUG #5732: parsing of: "WHERE mycol=123AND ..." |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I experimented a bit with mysql's behavior, and it seems that (at least >> in 5.1.51) what they do is treat "1and" or "2or" as if it were an >> identifier. They're definitely not throwing an error, at least not on > I guess the eleant question is what the lexical elements section of > the standard says about identifiers. It pretty clearly declares that > they can't start with digits: Yeah. The key point IMO is that this *input* is not spec-compliant. So implementations can either throw an error, or define their own spec extension as to how to interpret it. I find mysql's behavior interesting mostly because it shows that throwing an error isn't necessarily common practice. Anybody want to try Oracle, DB2, etc? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: