Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19870.1523051074@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2018-04-06 16:59:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> But in particular, it's clear that partition_prune and >> isolation/checksum_cancel are showing big problems. > While I'm obviously also unhappy about the frantic push to push semi > baked stuff, I'm not sure the two issues you point to above are that > good examples of carelessness. At least the latter seems mostly a pretty > normal portability thing around orderedness? I'm just venting, perhaps, but if there's a good reason for that to have been left broken for ~24 hours, I don't know what it is. It's getting in the way of testing other recent commits. (I'm also not real happy about the amount of time the checksum-xxx tests consume.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: