Re: Commit fest queue
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commit fest queue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19858.1207751996@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commit fest queue (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commit fest queue
Re: Commit fest queue |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I still think it would be best if the patch authors did the work. They > are the ones who care about the patch and want the review, and they're > in the best position to know what the status of a patch is. Unfortunately, a lot of submitters are way too optimistic about that ... > it's bad because good patches from one-off submitters might fall through > the cracks. Exactly. Somebody (or preferably somebodies) has to accept the responsibility of seeing to it that everything gets onto the commit-fest page; requiring the authors to do it simply won't work reliably. And it'd be more work for them anyway --- consider an author who hasn't got an account on our wiki and/or has never edited a wiki page before. Somebody who does it every day will certainly be a lot faster. This doesn't seem particularly hard, just a matter of following the relevant mailing lists (mostly -patches, but various offenders send patches elsewhere) and adding links to the current wiki page. > That's where I'd love to have Bruce to help. Bruce has made it perfectly clear that he doesn't want to take on any added maintenance work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: