Re: PQConnectPoll, connect(2), EWOULDBLOCK and somaxconn
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PQConnectPoll, connect(2), EWOULDBLOCK and somaxconn |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19850.1372340905@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PQConnectPoll, connect(2), EWOULDBLOCK and somaxconn (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-06-26 20:07:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> However, some more trolling of the intertubes suggests that Cygwin's >> emulation of socket() does indeed return EINPROGRESS; see for instance >> this ancient thread of ours: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/14855.49635.565990.716645@kryten.bedford.waii.com#14855.49635.565990.716645@kryten.bedford.waii.com >> Unless we want to distinguish Cygwin from native Windows in this code >> chunk, maybe we'd better leave well enough alone. > After some looking it gets funnier. There currently doesn't seem to be > any chance that we actually can get an EINPROGRESS at that level on > windows. We #define connect() to pgwin32_connect() which fudges errno > around. Where WSAEINPROGRESS is mapped to EINVAL. That's only in the backend though: note the #define is controlled by #ifndef FRONTEND, and we don't link backend/port/win32/socket.c into libpq anyway. The signal managing it's doing wouldn't work at all in client-side programs. But yeah, on the backend side we would definitely treat WSAEINPROGRESS as a hard error. OTOH, we don't use nonblocking connect (much?) in the backend so I'm not sure whether that's a directly comparable case or not. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: