Re: Out of swap space & memory
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Out of swap space & memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19826.1092084642@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Out of swap space & memory ("Kevin Bartz" <kbartz@loyaltymatrix.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Kevin Bartz" <kbartz@loyaltymatrix.com> writes: > Hi Lincoln! Thanks for your reply. On the problematic SELECT INTO, EXPLAIN > says: > test=# > QUERY PLAN > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > HashAggregate (cost=42.50..42.50 rows=1000 width=356) > -> Seq Scan on hp_raw (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=356) > (2 rows) It's fairly obvious that you have never vacuumed or analyzed hp_raw, since those numbers are the fallback defaults when a table is completely unknown to the planner :-( > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing that what I should infer from this > is that Postgres is indeed using hash aggregation. I just tried set > enable_hashagg = off, per your suggestion, and the SELECT INTO is grouping > away without blowup this time. Unfortunately, there's no end in sight. I've > let it sit and crank for an hour now, and it's still going. If you are running with the default value of sort_mem, it wouldn't be surprising for a sort-based aggregation to take awhile :-(. I would suggest cranking sort_mem up to something large (several hundred meg, maybe) for this specific operation. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: