Re: surrogate key or not?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: surrogate key or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19813.1090591668@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: surrogate key or not? (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: surrogate key or not?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com> writes: > You appear to be misunderstanding the purpose of a primary key. A > primary key is used to ensure there is a way to identify each row > uniquely. It is quite independent of which columns you may or may not > want to search on. If name is not going to be necessarily unique in the > table, it isn't a primary key. The other standard reason for using a made-up value as primary key is that it's under your control and you can guarantee it isn't going to change: one record will have the same primary key for its entire life, which vastly simplifies handling of foreign keys and so forth. If you use any real-world datum as primary key you necessarily buy into tracking changes in that real-world value. And handling duplicates. Names are certainly not unique, and they do change (marriage, etc) and people do miskey them and then expect to be able to fix the error later. As Achilleus' nearby story shows, you can have these problems (certainly the misentry part) even with imported data that is allegedly someone else's primary key; part numbers, USA social-security numbers, etc. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: