Re: SSI error messages
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI error messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19770.1310842883@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSI error messages (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI error messages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I think I would prefer something like this: > ERROR: could not serialize access due to read/write dependencies among > transactions > DETAIL: Reason code: %s > HINT: The transaction might succeed if retried. > That's my 2c, anyway. I see you committed this already, I don't > violently object to that either... Well, as I mentioned in the commit message, I've thought for some time that there were use cases for errdetail_internal. Whether these particular places in predicate.c use it or not doesn't affect that. I don't have a strong opinion about whether to do it like you suggest, other than that the proposed wording doesn't meet the message style guideline about detail messages being complete sentences. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: