Re: Upgrading to newer Django? Reason for including django-selectablelibrary in repo?
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading to newer Django? Reason for including django-selectablelibrary in repo? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1975f34e-a14f-efa0-8357-7d5e42e2a422@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrading to newer Django? Reason for including django-selectablelibrary in repo? ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading to newer Django? Reason for including django-selectablelibrary in repo?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
(Take 2 without prematurely sending. This is why I don't have nice things) On 3/3/20 5:10 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > Hi Kalvin, > > On 3/3/20 12:57 PM, Kalvin Eng wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I'm new to the community and looking to send a GSoC proposal for the >> performance farm project >> (https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GSoC_2020#Develop_Performance_Farm_Benchmarks_and_Website_.282020.29). > > Cool :) > >> One of the requirements was integrating the performance farm app with >> pgweb to include already registered users. >> So I had a look at the code for pgweb to understand the login flow for >> integration. >> >> Upon looking at the code for pgweb, I'm wondering if these things should >> be patched: >> >> * Upgrading to Django 2.2 LTS since Django 1.11 will no longer be >> supported in April 2020 > > Seems like a good idea. IIRC Magnus did some testing way back on 2.0 > (unless I'm imagining) *I believe Magnus had tested it on 2.0 and it either mostly or all worked. I don't think we've done too much wonky development on the backend since the Python 3 move. Needs some thorough testing, of course. >> * Remove django-selectable from the repo as it is available in pypi >> (https://pypi.org/project/django-selectable/) In production we use the system packages, so we'd have to ensure that it's there first before removing it (which otherwise is why it'd be an embedded dependency) Thanks, Jonathan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: