Re: 9.4 broken on alpha
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.4 broken on alpha |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19758.1440536542@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.4 broken on alpha (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.4 broken on alpha
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Aaron W. Swenson wrote: >> In the 4 years that that particular line has been there, not once had >> anyone else run into it on Gentoo until a couple months ago. >> And it isn't a case of end users missing it as we have arch testers >> that test packages before marking them suitable for public consumption. >> Alpha is one of the arches. > This means that not once has anybody compiled in an Alpha in 4 years. Well, strictly speaking, there were no uses of pg_read_barrier until 9.4. However, pg_write_barrier (which used "wmb") was in use since 9.2; so unless you're claiming your assembler knows wmb but not rmb, the code's failed to compile for Alpha since 9.2. >> As for the dropped support, has the Alpha specific code been ripped >> out? Would it still presumably run on Alpha? > Yes, code has been ripped out. I would assume that it doesn't build at > all anymore, but maybe what happens is you get spinlocks emulated with > semaphores and it's only horribly slow. The whole business about laxer-than-average memory coherency gives me the willies, though. It's fairly likely that PG has never worked right on multi-CPU Alphas. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: