Re: New Object Access Type hooks
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1974785.1649098875@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New Object Access Type hooks (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New Object Access Type hooks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes: > # Running: pg_ctl kill QUIT 2083 > ok 4 - killed process with SIGQUIT > # pump_until: process terminated unexpectedly when searching for "(?^m:WARNING: terminating connection because of crashof another server process|server closed the connection unexpectedly|connection to server was lost)" with stream: "psql:<stdin>:9:WARNING: terminating connection because of unexpected SIGQUIT signal > # psql:<stdin>:9: could not send data to server: Socket is not connected > # " > not ok 5 - psql query died successfully after SIGQUIT And there we have it: the test wasn't updated for the new backend message spelling, and we're seeing a different frontend behavior. Evidently the backend is dying before we're able to send the "SELECT 1;" to it. I'm not quite sure whether it's a libpq bug that it doesn't produce the "connection to server was lost" message here, but in any case I suspect that we shouldn't be checking for the second and third regex alternatives. The "terminating connection" warning absolutely should get through, and if it doesn't we want to know about it. So my proposal for a fix is to change the regex to be just "WARNING: terminating connection because of unexpected SIGQUIT signal". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: