Re: index on points
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index on points |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19545.971195784@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index on points (Jeff Hoffmann <jeff@propertykey.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Jeff Hoffmann <jeff@propertykey.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> There is already support for r-tree indexes, but as far as I know the >> '@' operator is not connected up to indexes. > i'm just throwing this out without testing it, but i think something > like this might work: coerce both the point and polygon into boxes (i > think box(polygon) gives you the bounding box, at least) and use the > overlap (&&) operator, which works fine with r-tree indexes on two > boxes, then use the contained operator (@) on what you get from that. Right, that's pretty much exactly what index support for @ would do for you under-the-hood. I wouldn't expect the index to give you an answer finer-grained than bounding boxes, so you'd still need to run @ itself on the candidates found by the indexable query. Jeff has a good point that doing the transformation by hand might be an acceptable answer for the time being. You can hack a lot of queries in the time it will take to teach the system to do that same transformation ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: