Re: ARC patent
От | Mark Woodward |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ARC patent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19535.24.91.171.78.1112381435.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ARC patent ("Dave Held" <dave.held@arrayservicesgrp.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marian POPESCU [mailto:softexpert@libertysurf.fr] >> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:06 AM >> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ARC patent >> >> >>>Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the >> >>>>patent application is still pending, although the USPTO >> >>>>site is a little hard to grok): >> >>> >> >>>Ugh. We could hope that the patent wouldn't be granted, >> >>>but I think it unlikely, unless Jan is aware of prior art >> >>>(like a publication predating the filing date). I fear we'll >> >>>have to change or remove that code. > > Why not just ask IBM for a free license first? After all, they put > 1,000+ patents in the public domain or something, didn't they? Did you ever get the feeling you've seen or done something before? It's like dejavu all over again. :-) It is april 1st, after all.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: