Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19492.1120146487@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > That's controlled by pg_hba.conf though, isn't it? The idea being that > you'd like to give some people the ability to create users/roles, but to > limit the databases those created users/roles could connect to by, say, > requiring they have 'usage' or 'connect' permissions to that database, > which could be set by the database owner; without the database owner > having write permissions to the pg_hba.conf. You can do that today by putting a group name in pg_hba.conf. Roles will make it more flexible; I don't see that we need anything more. For instance, if pg_hba.conf says "samegroup" then you could manage everything by associating a group with each database. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: