Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19492.1050609126@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes: >> I think the idea has some merit; although I wonder whether it >> wouldn't be smarter to put the code in the backend so that you don't >> need a parser in psql. The SHOW code could fall back to looking at >> these possibilities after it fails to find a match to a GUC variable >> name. > Well, I think that the backend should be kept clean of MySQL's > nastiness. Keep in mind though that there was already talk of migrating most of the \d functionality to the backend (primarily as a way of decoupling psql from catalog version changes). If we were to do that, it would make good sense to make it accessible via SHOW as well. IMHO anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: