Re: timezone GUC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: timezone GUC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19473.1306117446@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: timezone GUC (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: timezone GUC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> But also, 99.999% of the time >> it would be completely wasted effort because the DBA wouldn't remove the >> postgresql.conf setting at all, ever. > Well, by that argument, we ought not to worry about masterminding what > happens if the DBA does do such a thing -- just run the whole process > and damn the torpedoes. If it causes a brief database stall, at least > they'll get the correct behavior. Yeah, maybe. But I don't especially want to document "If you remove a pre-existing setting of TimeZone from postgresql.conf, expect your database to lock up hard for multiple seconds" ... and I think we couldn't responsibly avoid mentioning it. At the moment that disclaimer reads more like "If you remove a pre-existing setting of TimeZone from postgresql.conf, the database will fall back to a default that might not be what you were expecting". Is A really better than B? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: