Re: Schema + User-Defined Data Type Indexing problems...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema + User-Defined Data Type Indexing problems... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19454.1086841261@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Schema + User-Defined Data Type Indexing problems... (Chris Gamache <cgg007@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schema + User-Defined Data Type Indexing problems...
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Chris Gamache <cgg007@yahoo.com> writes: > I'm having a heck of a time, and it seems like in my thrashing about > to find a solution to this problem I have ruined the uniqueidentifier > datatype in the schema... > CREATE INDEX mt_uuid_idx > ON my_schema.my_table USING btree (my_uuid); > ERROR: data type my_schema.uniqueidentifier has no default operator class for > access method "btree" > HINT: You must specify an operator class for the index or define a default > operator class for the data type. > I can look at the operator classes and see that there is an operator class for > btree for my_schema.uniqueidentifier. IIRC, the opclass has to be in a schema that is in your schema search path to be found by CREATE INDEX by default. If it isn't, you could specify it explicitly: CREATE INDEX mt_uuid_idx ON my_schema.my_table USING btree (my_uuid USING my_schema.uuidopclass); It's possible that we could think of a more convenient behavior for default opclasses, but I don't want to do something that would foreclose having similarly-named datatypes in different schemas. You have any suggestions? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: