Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19394.1047803852@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org (Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org
Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org Re: postgresql meltdown on PlanetMath.org |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Aaron Krowne <akrowne@vt.edu> writes: > So, either it is broken, or doing a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE rather than just > VACUUM ANALYZE made all the difference. Is this possible (the latter, > we know the former is possible...)? If your FSM parameters in postgresql.conf are too small, then plain vacuums might have failed to keep up with the available free space, leading to a situation where vacuum full is essential. Did you happen to notice whether the vacuum full shrunk the database's disk footprint noticeably? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: