Re: 8.1 substring bug?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.1 substring bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19393.1131726157@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.1 substring bug? (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.1 substring bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > In this particular case the syntax makes it unclear that the substring > is the problem. Perhaps here the solution would be to put a cast in the > grammer, like so: > substr_for: FOR a_expr { $$ =3D makeTypeCast($2,"int4"); } > ; Not there, because it would break the variants where FOR introduces a character expression, eg <regular expression substring function> ::= SUBSTRING <left paren> <character value expression> FROM <character value expression> FOR <escape character> <right paren> But I think we could do this in substr_list in the case where we have just "a_expr substr_for", because there are no variants of that where the FOR expression is supposed to be string. See my other message just now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: