Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1934987.1619365195@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 01:43:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I haven't looked, but did we put anything into pg_stat_statements >> to make it easy to tell if you've messed up this setting? > You mean apart from from having pg_stat_statements' view/SRFs returning > nothing? > I think it's a reasonable use case to sometime disable query_id calculation, > eg. if you know that it will only lead to useless bloat in the entry and that > you won't need the info, so spamming warnings if there are no queryid could > cause some pain. I agree repeated warnings would be bad news. I was wondering if we could arrange a single warning at the time pg_stat_statements is preloaded into the postmaster. In this way, if you tried to use a configuration file that used to work, you'd hopefully get some notice about why it no longer does what you want. Also, if you are preloading pg_stat_statements, it seems reasonable to assume that you'd like the global value of the flag to be "on", even if there are use-cases for transiently disabling it. I think the way to detect "being loaded into the postmaster" is if (IsPostmasterEnvironment && !IsUnderPostmaster) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: