Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19349.1435447243@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows
Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows Re: pg_file_settings view vs. Windows |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: >> I noticed that in EXEC_BACKEND builds (ie, Windows) the pg_file_settings >> view doesn't act as its author presumably intended. Specifically, it >> reads as empty until/unless the current session processes a SIGHUP event. > I'm just wondering why we did not catch this earlier. If this is > because threre's no regression test case for pg_file_settings view, Yeah, exactly. Unfortunately I see no way to add a useful test, at least not one that will work in installcheck mode. There's no way to predict what will be in the view in that case. Even for "make check", the output would be pretty darn environment-dependent. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: