Re: 64-bit CommandIds
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit CommandIds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19319.1209133715@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 64-bit CommandIds (Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit CommandIds
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs@cybertec.at> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Question for Hans-Juergen and Zoltan: have you tested 8.3 and do you >> still see the need for this? > i have seen this problem two or three times within the past 2-3 years or > so. so, it can basically happen in the field for some special purpose > applications but i don't see this as an every day problem. it would be > nice to have it in. So these experiences were pre-8.3, right? The reason that I'm harping on that is that plpgsql does a CommandCounterIncrement for each expression it evaluates, whether or not there's any visible database access. As of 8.3 that won't cause consumption of CIDs, but before it did. I suspect that in a lot of real-world scenarios, CID consumption from triggers will be down by an order of magnitude. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: