Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count
От | Steve Howe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple count |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19285433937.20020909003739@carcass.dhs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Solving the "Return proper effected tuple
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Bruce, Monday, September 9, 2002, 12:22:26 AM, you wrote: BM> Steve Howe wrote: >> JC> return OID if sum of all replacement INSERTs in the rule inserted >> JC> only one row, else zero >> I don't agree with this one since it would lead us to a meaningless >> information... what would be the number retrieved ? Not an OID, nor >> nothing. BM> I don't understand this objection. I misunderstood Joe's statement into thinking we wanted to sum the OIDs for all INSERT commands applied :) Please ignore this. But now that I read it again, I would prefer having at least one OID for the last inserted row. With this info, I would be able to refresh my client dataset to reflect the new inserted rows. I see returning 0 if multiple INSERT commands issued is as weird as returning some OID if multiple INSERT commands issued. But the second options is usable, while the first one is useless... So I would prefer retrieving the last inserted OID. ------------- Best regards,Steve Howe mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: