Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1927.1236711562@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> You're just putting the hard decision onto packagers, who have no more >> knowledge than you do about what their users want, and (probably) >> considerably less understanding of the benefits/risks of some new >> configure option they happen to notice. > Which is exactly why we have two types of RPMS, --integer-datetimes and > not. Maybe Devrim is doing that, but nobody else is. Debian went for --integer-datetimes years ago, Red Hat stuck with floats. Nobody is going to go to the trouble of maintaining two sets of RPMs, even assuming they notice there's a choice. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: