I wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> [ num_nulls_v6.patch ]
> I started looking through this. It seems generally okay, but I'm not
> very pleased with the function name "num_notnulls". I think it would
> be better as "num_nonnulls", as I see Oleksandr suggested already.
Not hearing any complaints, I pushed it with that change and some other
cosmetic adjustments.
regards, tom lane