Re: psql \d+ and oid display
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \d+ and oid display |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19263.1396368555@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql \d+ and oid display (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql \d+ and oid display
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> The bottom line is we already have complex rules to display only what is >> _reasonable_. If you want everything, you have to look at the system >> tables. > I don't really agree with that. I understand that there's some > information (like dependencies) that you can't get through psql > because we don't really have a principled idea for what an interface > to that would look like, but I don't think that's a good thing. Every > time I have to write a query by hand to get some information instead > of being able to get it through a backslash command, that slows me > down considerably. But I'm lucky in that I actually know enough to do > that, which most users don't. Information that you can't get through > \d+ just isn't available to a large percentage of our user base > without huge effort. We shouldn't be stingy about putting stuff in > there that people may need to see. At least in this particular case, that's an uninteresting argument. We aren't being stingy with information, because the proposed new display approach provides *exactly the same information* as before. (If you see the "Has OIDs" line, it's got OIDs, otherwise it doesn't.) What we are being stingy about is display clutter, and I believe that's a good thing. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: