Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19262.1270142946@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document
improvements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > That seems pretty reasonable to me. I haven't checked how much code > impact there is. I know Tom doesn't think we should change it at all, > but surely pre-beta is the time to fix nasty corner cases that were > added by recently committed patches? What nasty corner case? Having replication connections use superuser reserved slots seems exactly the behavior I'd expect given that they are running as superuser. I agree it would be good to decouple that later, but we already decided we are not going to try to separate replication privilege from superuser in 9.0. (Also, autovacuum workers are a quite separate concept since the DBA doesn't set them up or deal with them directly. So I'm unimpressed by pointing to the treatment of autovacuum_max_workers as a precedent.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: