Re: Error-safe user functions

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the design is evolving in your head as you think about this
> more, which is totally understandable and actually very good. However,
> this is also why I think that you should produce the patch you
> actually want instead of letting other people repeatedly submit
> patches and then complain that they weren't what you had in mind.

OK, Corey hasn't said anything, so I will have a look at this over
the weekend.

            regards, tom lane