Re: Rules going away (was: [Solved] Generic logging system for pre-hstore using plperl triggers)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rules going away (was: [Solved] Generic logging system for pre-hstore using plperl triggers) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19244.1317220472@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rules going away (was: [Solved] Generic logging system for pre-hstore using plperl triggers) (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rules going away (was: [Solved] Generic logging system
for pre-hstore using plperl triggers)
Re: Rules going away |
Список | pgsql-general |
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:20:04AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: >> There's an even better reason not to use rules: they're going away in >> a not too distant version of PostgreSQL. > Really? How? I thought views were done using rules under the hood? > Also, it'd be awfully nice if, in case rules are going away, the > documentation actually said prominently in the rules section, "Rules > are deprecated and are planned to be removed at some point in the > future." Right now, anyone coming to Postgres for the first time > could easily understand the manual to say that Postgres has this cool > feature on which they can rely. I think the true state of affairs is this: rules have a lot of surprising behaviors, and if we could think of something that works more straightforwardly, we'd love to replace them. But I think we'd have to have the "something" in place before we consider deprecating rules. At the moment we don't even have a glimmer of a design, so David's statement is many years premature. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: