Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19232.1470090524@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!?
Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!? Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-08-01 18:09:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> (Also vaguely on the list of things to clean up: can't we make it so >> that bgworkers aren't launched from inside a signal handler? Blech.) > Isn't pretty much everything on-demand below postmaster started from a > signal handler? I think it depends. As an example, maybe_start_bgworker is called from PostmasterMain, *and* from ServerLoop, *and* from reaper, *and* from sigusr1_handler. That's likely excessive, but it's what we've got at the moment. I'm pretty sure regular backends are only launched from ServerLoop, but for anything else it's uncertain. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: