Re: String manipulation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: String manipulation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19143.1077063185@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: String manipulation (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: String manipulation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I don't think it is good practice for a CHECK constraint to change its > behavior based on a GUC variable. You can develop comparable "failure scenarios" for any of the GUC variables that affect query semantics --- timezone, sql_inheritance, you name it. Locking them all down when a check constraint or function or view is created seems impractical ... and if we did do it then we'd get complaints about that too. ("What do you mean I can't change the setting later?") In practice I think we have to assume that those variables are set consistently within any one application. If you go frobbing them on-the-fly then you're going to have issues. I suppose paranoid sorts might lobby to make any GUC variable that can change query semantics be a superuser-only setting, but to me that cure sounds worse than the disease. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: