Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Дата
Msg-id
19122.1005279566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian  writes:
> Doesn't bison deal with #include?  I guess not.  The only other way is
> to make a gram.y.pre, and have Makefile do the inclusions in the proper
> spot, and run that new gram.y through bison.

I was hoping to avoid that sort of kluge ... surely the bison designers
thought of include, and I'm just not seeing how it's done ...

			regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
FAQ