Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Дата
Msg-id
200111091914.fA9JEL112903@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Bruce Momjian  writes:
> > A validation script is a good intermediate idea,
> 
> IMHO a validation script would be *far* harder than the alternative
> I'm proposing, because it'd have to parse and interpret gram.y and
> keyword.c.  Building a correct-by-construction set of keyword lists
> seems much easier than checking their rather messy representation
> in those files.

Agreed.  It just removed the indirection problem mentioned by Thomas.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Klaus Naumann
Дата:
FAQ