Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Дата
Msg-id
200111091914.fA9JEL112903@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > A validation script is a good intermediate idea, > > IMHO a validation script would be *far* harder than the alternative > I'm proposing, because it'd have to parse and interpret gram.y and > keyword.c. Building a correct-by-construction set of keyword lists > seems much easier than checking their rather messy representation > in those files. Agreed. It just removed the indirection problem mentioned by Thomas. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления