Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1910.975909630@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 ("Billy G. Allie" <bga@mug.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Billy G. Allie" <bga@mug.org> writes: > ... The DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO definition was originally put in to work > around a macro size limitation of the UnixWare 2.1 C compiler (and > later the SCO UDK (Universal Development Kit)). If the gnu C compiler > is being used it should not be defined. Hm. Is anyone likely to still be using a version of that compiler that still has such limitations? I ask because we recently pulled "#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO" from port/sco.h, on the grounds that various people were seeing more harm than good from it. But I'm suddenly wondering whether those people might've been using gcc. I wonder if #ifndef __GNUC__#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO#endif in port/sco.h would be the smart way to go. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: