Re: still gin index creation takes forever
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: still gin index creation takes forever |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19090.1226598428@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: still gin index creation takes forever (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: still gin index creation takes forever
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: >> We could extend IndexBuildHeapScan's API to support that, but I'm >> not quite convinced that this is the issue. > That extension might be useful for bitmap index too to simplify index creation > process. Maybe, but in any case the measurable GIN speed penalty justifies changing it; I've applied a patch for that. I'm still not quite convinced that Ivan isn't seeing some other issue though. In the meantime, I noticed something odd while experimenting with your test case: when running with default maintenance_work_mem = 16MB, there is a slowdown of 3x or 4x for the un-ordered case, just as you say. But at maintenance_work_mem = 200MB I see very little difference. This doesn't make sense to me --- it seems like a larger workspace should result in more difference because of greater chance to dump a lot of tuples into the index at once. Do you know why that's happening? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: